This past Saturday, the United States Southern Command conducted two deadly strikes on vessels linked to designated terrorist organizations in the Eastern Pacific, resulting in the deaths of five narco-terrorists and leaving one survivor. This marks a significant escalation in the Trump administration's anti-narcotics campaign.
The operation was authorized by General Francis L. Donovan, commander of the Southern Command, and executed by the Joint Task Force Southern Spear, the military arm of Operation Southern Spear, which began in the autumn of 2025.
In the initial strike, two individuals were killed, while one managed to survive. The subsequent attack claimed the lives of three more. Remarkably, no U.S. military personnel were injured during these operations.
The Southern Command verified through military intelligence that both vessels were navigating well-known drug trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and were actively engaged in drug operations.
Strategic Goals of Operation Southern Spear
The main objective of the campaign is succinctly stated by the institution as "imposing total systemic friction on the cartels."
Following the first strike, the Southern Command promptly alerted the U.S. Coast Guard to initiate a search and rescue mission for the survivor. Subsequently, the Mexican Navy took over the rescue operation approximately 830 kilometers southeast of Acapulco, in international waters, confirming the attacks occurred outside any territorial jurisdiction, as reported by Mexico News Daily.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that Mexican authorities assumed control of the rescue. Mexico has maintained a low-confrontation stance towards U.S. attacks in waters adjacent to its territory, even undertaking humanitarian missions without issuing formal public condemnations.
Impact and Legal Framework of the Campaign
The strikes on Saturday are part of a campaign that has reached unprecedented intensity. Since the launch of Operation Southern Spear, the total number of narco-terrorist casualties exceeded 163 by early April 2026. Under General Donovan's new leadership, at least six attacks were recorded in February alone, resulting in 24 deaths. On March 8, a strike in the Eastern Pacific killed six narco-terrorists, and another on March 25 in the Caribbean left four dead.
The Joint Task Force Southern Spear was established in October 2025, building on the II Marine Expeditionary Force. Secretary Hegseth formally introduced it in November of the same year, integrating ground troops, air and logistics support, as well as robotic surface ships, interceptor boats, and vertical takeoff and landing drones.
By the end of November 2025, the U.S. had amassed the largest military presence in the Western Hemisphere since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.
The operation's legal framework is based on the designation of six Mexican cartels—Sinaloa, Jalisco New Generation, Gulf, Northeast, New Michoacan Family, and United Cartels—as Foreign Terrorist Organizations. This designation was made on February 19, 2025, through an executive order signed by Trump on his first day in office. It allows members of these groups to be treated as terrorist combatants under the law of armed conflict, enabling the use of lethal force in international waters.
Organizations such as the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) have criticized these strikes as illegal extrajudicial executions under international law, arguing that it prohibits targeting individuals without evidence of imminent threat and without due process. The debate over the legality of these strikes remains unresolved as the military campaign shows no signs of slowing down.
Key Questions About U.S. Military Actions Against Narco-Terrorists
What is Operation Southern Spear?
Operation Southern Spear is a military campaign led by the U.S. Southern Command to combat drug trafficking and narco-terrorism in the Eastern Pacific. It was launched in the fall of 2025 and involves coordinated strikes against designated terrorist organizations.
How does the U.S. justify its military actions in international waters?
The U.S. justifies its military actions in international waters by designating certain Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, allowing the use of lethal force under the law of armed conflict.
What has been Mexico's response to U.S. military actions near its territory?
Mexico has maintained a low-confrontation stance towards U.S. military actions near its territory, often taking on humanitarian roles without issuing formal public condemnations.