In a recent controversial appearance, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez was presented by the Cuban regime as engaging in a "live" dialogue with both national and international press. However, this event has been cast into doubt due to a seemingly minor detail—a watch on the wrist of state journalist Arleen Rodríguez Derivet—which has sparked suspicion that the session was pre-recorded.
The watch worn by Rodríguez Derivet, serving as the moderator, displayed a time close to 5 PM, which contradicts the official claim that the event was broadcast live on Thursday morning. This discrepancy serves as evidence that the appearance was recorded and edited beforehand, then presented to the public as a live occurrence, essentially staging a pre-planned performance.
Absence of Independent International Media
Another major criticism revolves around the lack of independent international news agencies. Although authorities claimed that foreign press was present, the room was occupied solely by correspondents from government-friendly media outlets like RT (Russia) and Xinhua (China). Prensa Latina was touted as an "international" representative, despite being a Cuban state entity, raising further questions among those expecting participation from agencies like EFE, AFP, or AP.
Official Narrative and Public Skepticism
The official YouTube channel of Cuba's Presidency shared the video with the description that President Díaz-Canel was conversing with national and international media representatives on issues such as the country's internal situation, impacts of recent U.S. administration measures, international support, relations with Venezuela, and potential dialogue with Washington. However, many in Cuban society—particularly those engaged in discussions on social media and alternative outlets—believe that the controlled format, featuring sympathetic journalists and lacking independent press, underscores the government's preference for staged events over genuine live interactions.
So far, Cuban authorities have not publicly clarified whether the appearance was indeed pre-recorded, nor have they addressed the manipulation allegations. Nevertheless, the controversy surrounding the watch and the absence of independent foreign press only intensifies doubts about the authenticity of what was presented as a "live" dialogue.
Questions Surrounding the Authenticity of Díaz-Canel's Appearance
Why is the watch on Arleen Rodríguez Derivet's wrist significant?
The watch showed a time that contradicted the official claim of the event being live, suggesting it was pre-recorded.
What criticism has been levied regarding the presence of international media?
The criticism centers on the lack of independent international media, as only correspondents from pro-government outlets were present.
How has the Cuban government responded to the allegations of manipulation?
As of now, they have not made any public clarifications or responded to the allegations.